My Photo

Reiter's Consulting

  • Wireless Internet & Mobile Computing

    I have been analyzing wireless communications for more than 28 years. I am president of Wireless Internet & Mobile Computing, a pioneering consulting firm that helps create new and enhance existing wireless data businesses in the United States and abroad.

    Previously, I created the world's first wireless data newsletter, wireless data conference, cellular conference and FM radio subcarrier newsletter. I was instrumental in creating and developing the world's first cellular magazine.

    I also helped create and run the first association in the U.S. for the paging and mobile telephone industries.

    E-Mail: reiter@wirelessinternet.com
    Phone: 1-301-634-1586

Reiter's Weblogs

Camera Phone Favorites

  • My Own Photos
    www.flickr.com
    This is a Flickr badge showing public photos from Alan A. Reiter. Make your own badge here.

Mobile TV Vendors

Mobile TV Events

Google Search


« iPhone airtimes rates released but photo pricing not mentioned | Main | iPhone's two megapixel camera: Reports of quality range from so-so to good »

Tuesday, June 26, 2007

New York Times' iPhone photos good in good lighting, poor otherwise

The New York Times' technology writer David Pogue posted ten photos he shot with the Apple iPhone's two megapixel camera as part of his overall review of the phone.

Bottom line:  Under good lighting conditions when the subject isn't moving (see below), the photos he posted look rather good.  Under other conditions, though, the photos are poor.

Apple_iphone_david_pogue_photo_good

The photo of the dog and other photos under good conditions look excellent for a two megapixel camera phone.  But in low light the photos "tend to fall to pieces" (see below) as Pogue says.

Apple_iphone_david_pogue_photo_low_

The photos also are blurred when the subject is moving (see below).

Apple_iphone_david_pogue_photo_movi

No surprise

None of these results is surprising.

Two megapixel camera phones can produce rather good photos -- good enough to print -- if the light is sufficiently bright and the subject (and camera) remain(s) steady.

Camera phones have an especially difficult time taking photos in low light conditions.  One reason is the shutter stays open longer so there's a much greater chance the camera or the subject will move.  Also, many camera phones don't offer any way to manually increase (or decrease) the exposure level or the shutter speed.

But sometimes it's possible to take very interesting -- indeed, artistic -- camera phone photos in low light if you care to do so and know what you're doing.  In addition, some camera phones offer a variety of modes for "sports" (fast-moving subjects), "portrait" (foreground is sharp and background is blurred), "landscape" (distance is sharp), etc.

Camera as stepchild

The camera in the iPhone seems to be something of a feature stepchild.  There's no flash, no optical zoom and no video recording.  Given the iPhone's emphasis on multimedia, including viewing photos and videos, as well as the worldwide ramifications of wireless imaging, it's a bit strange that the camera functionality is so basic.

However, this is version 1.0 of the iPhone, and Apple has many objectives with its first phone besides just offering a camera.  Certainly I'd love to have the iPhone now -- regardless of the version! -- but to use my own money to purchase it I'm waiting until 2008 when I assume the handset will have HSDPA for the U.S. and incorporate a multitude of hardware tweaks and software additions.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/133/19628394

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference New York Times' iPhone photos good in good lighting, poor otherwise:

Comments

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

May 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Imaging Ads


Categories

What I'm Reading