My Photo

Reiter's Consulting

  • Wireless Internet & Mobile Computing

    I have been analyzing wireless communications for more than 30 years. I am president of Wireless Internet & Mobile Computing, a pioneering consulting firm that helps create new and enhance existing wireless data businesses in the United States and abroad.

    Previously, I created the world's first wireless data newsletter, wireless data conference, cellular conference and FM radio subcarrier newsletter. I was instrumental in creating and developing the world's first cellular magazine.

    I also helped create and run the first association in the U.S. for the paging and mobile telephone industries.

    E-Mail: reiter@wirelessinternet.com
    Phone: 1-301-634-1586

Mobile TV Events

Search


  • Google

    WWW
    www.mobiletelevisionreport.com

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    Reiter's Weblogs

    Camera Phone Favorites

    • My Own Photos
      www.flickr.com
      This is a Flickr badge showing public photos from Alan A. Reiter. Make your own badge here.

    « iPhone airtimes rates released but photo pricing not mentioned | Main | iPhone's two megapixel camera: Reports of quality range from so-so to good »

    Tuesday, June 26, 2007

    New York Times' iPhone photos good in good lighting, poor otherwise

    The New York Times' technology writer David Pogue posted ten photos he shot with the Apple iPhone's two megapixel camera as part of his overall review of the phone.

    Bottom line:  Under good lighting conditions when the subject isn't moving (see below), the photos he posted look rather good.  Under other conditions, though, the photos are poor.

    Apple_iphone_david_pogue_photo_good

    The photo of the dog and other photos under good conditions look excellent for a two megapixel camera phone.  But in low light the photos "tend to fall to pieces" (see below) as Pogue says.

    Apple_iphone_david_pogue_photo_low_

    The photos also are blurred when the subject is moving (see below).

    Apple_iphone_david_pogue_photo_movi

    No surprise

    None of these results is surprising.

    Two megapixel camera phones can produce rather good photos -- good enough to print -- if the light is sufficiently bright and the subject (and camera) remain(s) steady.

    Camera phones have an especially difficult time taking photos in low light conditions.  One reason is the shutter stays open longer so there's a much greater chance the camera or the subject will move.  Also, many camera phones don't offer any way to manually increase (or decrease) the exposure level or the shutter speed.

    But sometimes it's possible to take very interesting -- indeed, artistic -- camera phone photos in low light if you care to do so and know what you're doing.  In addition, some camera phones offer a variety of modes for "sports" (fast-moving subjects), "portrait" (foreground is sharp and background is blurred), "landscape" (distance is sharp), etc.

    Camera as stepchild

    The camera in the iPhone seems to be something of a feature stepchild.  There's no flash, no optical zoom and no video recording.  Given the iPhone's emphasis on multimedia, including viewing photos and videos, as well as the worldwide ramifications of wireless imaging, it's a bit strange that the camera functionality is so basic.

    However, this is version 1.0 of the iPhone, and Apple has many objectives with its first phone besides just offering a camera.  Certainly I'd love to have the iPhone now -- regardless of the version! -- but to use my own money to purchase it I'm waiting until 2008 when I assume the handset will have HSDPA for the U.S. and incorporate a multitude of hardware tweaks and software additions.

    TrackBack

    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451cb2a69e200e5503294a88834

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference New York Times' iPhone photos good in good lighting, poor otherwise:

    Comments

    Verify your Comment

    Previewing your Comment

    This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

    Working...
    Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
    Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

    The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

    As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

    Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

    Working...

    Post a comment

    May 2008

    Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1 2 3
    4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    11 12 13 14 15 16 17
    18 19 20 21 22 23 24
    25 26 27 28 29 30 31

    Imaging Ads


    Categories

    What I'm Reading